O IDEB e a qualidade da educação: a política do IDEB nas escolas da rede municipal de Francisco Beltrão - PR, no período de 2007-2013

Abstract

The search analised the education quality conception os the Basic Education development Rate(Índice de Desenvolvimento da Educação Básica IDEB) and its impact in six public schools teachers in Francisco Beltrão-PR. The search aimed: to learn historically the context of large scale evaluation in Brazil; to analyze the IDBE s conception of quality, the foundation and prepositions to school context, to investigate how the IDEB reflect in the school context originating a consensus and/or resistance around the pedagogical work in municipal schools in Francisco Beltrão. In order to collect the empiric data it was used semi-structured interviews with 24 education workers, among them ten teachers, eight principals and six coordinators, besides 68 student notebooks of third and fifth grades aiming to verify the space and the time focused to knowledge area. It was also analyzed documents of Mundial Bank, OCDE, MEC and INEP, a bibliographic review of the studies related to the problematic around question of reading and analyzes of the books, articles, theses and essay data. So the search was done based in the theoretical-methodological perspective of the dialectic historical materialism. The results show that the IDBE s quality conception is characterized from demands of the Mundial Bank, FMI, BIRD and OCDE PISA quality pattern which based in the competence Pedagogy. It is highlighted the pragmatism as a evaluation guidelines and consequently to the learning, as well as the emphasis to contents evaluated through the Brazil Test in the Portuguese and Mathematics subjects, given focused the reading and problem solving competences and abilities. In this context, we consider the large scale evaluation has contributed to teaching disqualification due to fast graduation and guidelines books. When the schools are stuffed by MEC support material even it is affirmed they are around evaluation parameter and they should not use them as a curriculum they reinforce the function of a Educational State, which centralize the way and the content in order to generate a collective-worker new man and decentralize when it projects in school members the auto management and the responsibility of the process and their materialized results in the IDEB.